Deeper research into the King James Corporate DOG-LATIN Bible.
Deeper grammatical research has raised questions in relation to the DOG-LATIN, corrupt “GLOSSA” Text appearing in the King James Bible, being the Bible appearing in Corporate Courts. (Military tribunals). It has been confirmed that all uppercase text is no part of the English language. (Marginal Text) Usually the first and sometimes the second word at the beginning of every paragraph of the King James bible is Glossed in the Latin all uppercase text, however, the word (Sign): “Lord” has been glossed into a different style where the first letter “L” is of a larger font size from the other three glossed letters: “ORD”.
In grammatical terms, the GLOSSA (All uppercase Latin Text) has been removed from the text but the “thing” appearing as: “LORD”, glossed with the first letter “L” appearing at an even greater font size, is grammatically a removal of the word “Lord” from both the proper text and from the standard DOG-LATIN Text, appearing with in the King James Bible. “Yahweh”, in relation to the: “The Jerusalem Bible”, in not GLOSSED into marginal foreign text. The foreign GLOSSAS appear where they should, within the Margins.
There is also a strange concern with the “ORD” left separated from the “L” in the word (Sign) “LORD” rendering the “ORD” appearing, and in English, “Ord.” is an abbreviation for words relating to Order, and Ordain and the such, relating to Government. In relation to such an impression appearing as: “ORD” (Being LORD with a greater font size first letter) does this mean that if the real word: “Lord” or “Yahweh” has been replaced by “ORD” being the Government? … Has the true God of Moses, and Christ, been secretly replaced by “Government” meaning, if one swears under the oath of a corrupt bible where Government has been replaced by “God”, would such an act of swearing on a false bible destroy your God given rights? …
Both Lord and Yahweh means: “master” in relation to Latin, so has Government become the new “Master” of the Corporate Kings James Bible by secrecy and stealth?
The very last few words in Revelations, warns about the loss of the right to the “Tree of Life” (Dominion) being a curse if you remove anything from the Bible, so if a word is grammatically removed, even though the presumption leaves all words to be “presumed” to be in tact, could this be just another amazing deception by SATAN, in order to destroy a mans God given right over his dominion, even stooping so low as to grammatically destroy a Bible.
Here is an interesting talk with our wonderful friends in England, by Rohan Lorian, discussing more grammatical questions in relation to the validity of our corporate governments…
This speech by: Bob Katter, is an interesting reality of how the balancing of trade really works. It could be said that free trade benefits the countries, or should I say their “corporations” that have screwed their people the most, the lowest wages, the lowest rights, giving such a State Corporate Government the ability to compete on a world free market at the expense of such corporate government citizens. The corporation will win while its citizens (Trustee Slaves) will lose.
Love Bob Katter or hate him, this clip is a lesson in how things may turn out in the future. The destruction of manufacturing in Australia is a destruction of wealth, jobs, local business, and can lead to the destruction of society as it stands. Without industry, governments and military then also become losers because they are funded by such industry, and what happens when it all starts to crumble, in come the world corporate banks to plunder what is left, with their fraud and deceptions…
Dick Yardley is a well known and respected researcher in relation to the validity of true de-jure governments of Australia and their foreign quasi political copies. I put a question to Dick in relation to treason, relating to the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, signed by Whitlam in 1973. The United States, signed their sovereignty over in 1964 just after the Kennedy Murder. I will include the first part of his email, my question and than his response backed up by some disturbing facts.
Special thanks to Dick Yardley for the years of research and devotion he has made in order to shed light onto such deceptions perpetrated against normal working Australian people by a corrupt deceptive judiciary.
My Response to this statement:
Isn’t it funny how the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome was also signed by Whitlam in 1973, giving the equity of Australia a the Private Contracting system of Rome… Could anyone involved with their foreign Courts and their false corporate foreign registered governments be deemed as treasonous? …
It appears that the lies by the Judiciary and their quasi foreign administration companies passing themselves off as Governments, in order to hide such a deception against the Australian people, will end badly for those that have knowingly upheld such a deception.
Re: Grammatical Deceptions:
In relation to Gramma, I am not sure who underlined some parts of the sentence, however, the underlining grammatically “italics” such underlined text. Italics removes such text from the page, (Stand out, or from another source) rendering such a sentence as having a different meaning that what may be assumed by the ignorant. Were the underlines added to the constitution after it was written? because by adding an underline under parts of the text grammatically changes the text from the original meanings by grammatically removing such underlined words. If a man is not aware of the grammatical difference, such a man may not “notice” such a grammatical change and assume that such a constitution has not been altered. An added underline will grammatically change a sentence, so the question would be, who and when were underlines added to the constitution, for such underlines may be a cunning way to deceive the masses in order to gain a false impression of a true fact.
Could this be a way to murder the ignorant but to completely dismiss the one who holds the ability to be aware of the grammatical difference between the true fact and the ignorant presumption?
Lucifer appears to mean “Lying Text”, being related to a writing that can be assumed to read something other than what is truly grammatically and factually proper English text. The grammatical research undertaken by Rohan and I, in relation to the true correct meanings of words and symbols used by Western Governments, has truly opened a can of worms for such a corrupted elite that conduct such grammatical deceptions over the masses in order to gain arbitrary control over such masses.
DOG-LATIN, is a “Debased” form of Latin according to the Legal and English Dictionaries. The very word “debased” means “immoral” and “criminal” confirming such Dog Latin text to be that deriving from Lucifer.
Rohan Lorian, explains the Dog Latin, fraud and its relationship to the underworld of Lucifer.
This clip by Rohan Lorian, that holds no Surname or military account, explains more of the research relating to why Queenslanders, Australians and so many other people from the Western World, have lost any rights to “Justice”
Thanks to Rohan for sharing such research relating to the Military Accounts of the western governing system. Are such military accounts real or are they private mercenary accounts that you have been deceived into holding without your knowledge?